[Serusers] Interop? Re: [Serdev] Re: Re: TECHNICAL BOARD - Nomination and voting is open!

Greger V. Teigre greger at teigre.com
Fri May 25 14:42:45 CEST 2007


Hi Miklos,
I believe all the mentioned are already nominated and found on the 
overview page.  As for balance between companies, I hope we can avoid 
having a majority from a single commercial entity, as this can reinforce 
the (false) impression that iptel.org is controlled by a commercial 
entity. That being said, people are nominated (and I'm pretty sure also 
receive votes) based on their personal track record and all the 
currently nominated people have IMHO clearly showed their dedication 
across employers.
g-)

Miklos Tirpak wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> I would like to nominate Raphael Coeffic from SEMS development, Andrei 
> Pelinescu-Onciul and Jan Janak from SER development, Greger V. Teigre 
> and Martin Hoffmann from the boarder community.
>
> Looking at the actual state of the election I am just afraid that the 
> result will not be so balanced between the companies, hopefully it will 
> not cause any problem. Anyway, we can add some more people to the board 
> later if there is a need for it.
>
> Regards,
> Miklos
>
> On 05/24/2007 02:50 PM, Greger V. Teigre wrote:
>   
>> I suggest we focus on the technical board right now and pick up that 
>> ball a bit later. Note also that it's iptel.org contributors and not 
>> only SER contributors who are within the scope of nominations to the 
>> technical board.
>> g-)
>>
>> Jiri Kuthan wrote:
>>     
>>> Shall not we have another narrowly focused group for resolving interop
>>> issues, ideally recruited on a wider basis than SER contributors?
>>>
>>> -jiri
>>>
>>> At 12:41 24/05/2007, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Personally I will constrain myself to three however difficult it
>>>> may be (in alphabetical order): Andrei for his long-lasting core 
>>>> achievements and insights, Jan for his so-many-modules and DB-model 
>>>> achievements and insights, and Hendrik for his modules and hands-on 
>>>> operational experience. (Notwisthanding that, I really have a long 
>>>> list of other individuals whom I consider technically fit for that, 
>>>> Greger, Nils, Martin, Maxim, Miklos, ... actually the list would become
>>>> longer and longer, one just hast to make a call...)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -jiri
>>>>
>>>> At 11:19 24/05/2007, Jan Janak wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> I would like to nominate Stefan Sayer for SEMS, Jiri Kuthan and Andrei
>>>>> Pelinescu for SER, and last, but not least, Greger Teigre and Hendrik
>>>>> Scholz.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Jan.
>>>>>
>>>>> Greger V. Teigre wrote:
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Ok, I'll keep track of nominations on a new page on iptel.org if and
>>>>>> when people accept the nominations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let me start:
>>>>>> I would like to nominate Jan Janak and Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul for the
>>>>>> two developer positions (both due to their central involvement across
>>>>>> SER), N. (sip at arcdiv.com) as a user community representative (due to
>>>>>> long-time and valuable serusers activity), and Martin Hoffmann as a user
>>>>>> community representative (due to his strong SER credentials as book
>>>>>> auther, long-term developer and operator of service provider
>>>>>> installations).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As Raphael has already accepted his nomination as a SEMS
>>>>>> representative/developer, I only nominate four.
>>>>>> g-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SIP wrote:
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> You ought to stick up a page on the Iptel site somewhere to keep track
>>>>>>> of who's been nominated perhaps, so people could reference it when
>>>>>>> deciding their votes. Just an idea.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I nominate Greger to keep track of all of this voting nominating
>>>>>>> stuff! Seconded? ;)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> N.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Greger Viken Teigre wrote:
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> Why should voting be secret? We strive openness and transparency in
>>>>>>>> decision processes by making decisions through consensus on the
>>>>>>>> mailing lists. I think secret voting should have a very clear
>>>>>>>> rationale in order to prefer it.
>>>>>>>> g-)
>>>>>>>> ------- Original message -------
>>>>>>>> From: Martin Hoffmann <hn at nvnc.de>
>>>>>>>> Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org, serdev at lists.iptel.org, semsdev at iptel.org
>>>>>>>> Sent: 18.5.'07,  10:54
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>> Greger V. Teigre wrote:
>>>>>>>>>   
>>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>> I have received private questions on how to nominate and vote.  My
>>>>>>>>>> interpretation is that nobody has suggested that we nominate and
>>>>>>>>>> vote using another procedure than default in consensus building:
>>>>>>>>>> posting to the list.
>>>>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>> I think it is one main feature of all this voting business to be
>>>>>>>>> secret.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Martin
>>>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Serusers mailing list
>>>>>>>> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>>>>>>   
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Serusers mailing list
>>>>>> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>>>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Serdev mailing list
>>>>> Serdev at lists.iptel.org
>>>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20070525/830b8ff7/attachment.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list