[Serusers] [Serdev] Re: Re: TECHNICAL BOARD - Nomination and voting is open!

[Greger V. Teigre]

We then have 9 nominees on:
http://www.iptel.org/nominations_and_voting_technical_board_2007

Could those who have been nominated, but still are listed as "suggested" 
on the page above, please contact me privately to tell if they accept 
the nomination?
g-)

Jiri Kuthan wrote:
> Personally I will constrain myself to three however difficult it
> may be (in alphabetical order): Andrei for his long-lasting core 
> achievements and insights, Jan for his so-many-modules and DB-model 
> achievements and insights, and Hendrik for his modules and hands-on 
> operational experience. (Notwisthanding that, I really have a long 
> list of other individuals whom I consider technically fit for that, 
> Greger, Nils, Martin, Maxim, Miklos, ... actually the list would become
> longer and longer, one just hast to make a call...)
>
>
> -jiri
>
> At 11:19 24/05/2007, Jan Janak wrote:
>   
>> I would like to nominate Stefan Sayer for SEMS, Jiri Kuthan and Andrei
>> Pelinescu for SER, and last, but not least, Greger Teigre and Hendrik
>> Scholz.
>>
>>  Jan.
>>
>> Greger V. Teigre wrote:
>>     
>>> Ok, I'll keep track of nominations on a new page on iptel.org if and
>>> when people accept the nominations.
>>>
>>> Let me start:
>>> I would like to nominate Jan Janak and Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul for the
>>> two developer positions (both due to their central involvement across
>>> SER), N. (sip at arcdiv.com) as a user community representative (due to
>>> long-time and valuable serusers activity), and Martin Hoffmann as a user
>>> community representative (due to his strong SER credentials as book
>>> auther, long-term developer and operator of service provider
>>> installations).
>>>
>>> As Raphael has already accepted his nomination as a SEMS
>>> representative/developer, I only nominate four.
>>> g-)
>>>
>>>
>>> SIP wrote:
>>>       
>>>> You ought to stick up a page on the Iptel site somewhere to keep track
>>>> of who's been nominated perhaps, so people could reference it when
>>>> deciding their votes. Just an idea.
>>>>
>>>> I nominate Greger to keep track of all of this voting nominating
>>>> stuff! Seconded? ;)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> N.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Greger Viken Teigre wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> Why should voting be secret? We strive openness and transparency in
>>>>> decision processes by making decisions through consensus on the
>>>>> mailing lists. I think secret voting should have a very clear
>>>>> rationale in order to prefer it.
>>>>> g-)
>>>>> ------- Original message -------
>>>>> From: Martin Hoffmann <hn at nvnc.de>
>>>>> Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org, serdev at lists.iptel.org, semsdev at iptel.org
>>>>> Sent: 18.5.'07,  10:54
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Greger V. Teigre wrote:
>>>>>>   
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> I have received private questions on how to nominate and vote.  My
>>>>>>> interpretation is that nobody has suggested that we nominate and
>>>>>>> vote using another procedure than default in consensus building:
>>>>>>> posting to the list.
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> I think it is one main feature of all this voting business to be
>>>>>> secret.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Martin
>>>>>>     
>>>>>>             
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Serusers mailing list
>>>>> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>>>   
>>>>>           
>>>>         
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Serusers mailing list
>>> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serdev mailing list
>> Serdev at lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
>>     
>
>
>
> --
> Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/
>
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20070524/664f5c08/attachment.htm>