[Serusers] Interop? Re: [Serdev] Re: Re: TECHNICAL BOARD - Nomination and voting is open!

[Jiri Kuthan]

Shall not we have another narrowly focused group for resolving interop
issues, ideally recruited on a wider basis than SER contributors?

-jiri

At 12:41 24/05/2007, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
>Personally I will constrain myself to three however difficult it
>may be (in alphabetical order): Andrei for his long-lasting core 
>achievements and insights, Jan for his so-many-modules and DB-model 
>achievements and insights, and Hendrik for his modules and hands-on 
>operational experience. (Notwisthanding that, I really have a long 
>list of other individuals whom I consider technically fit for that, 
>Greger, Nils, Martin, Maxim, Miklos, ... actually the list would become
>longer and longer, one just hast to make a call...)
>
>
>-jiri
>
>At 11:19 24/05/2007, Jan Janak wrote:
>>I would like to nominate Stefan Sayer for SEMS, Jiri Kuthan and Andrei
>>Pelinescu for SER, and last, but not least, Greger Teigre and Hendrik
>>Scholz.
>>
>>  Jan.
>>
>>Greger V. Teigre wrote:
>>> Ok, I'll keep track of nominations on a new page on iptel.org if and
>>> when people accept the nominations.
>>> 
>>> Let me start:
>>> I would like to nominate Jan Janak and Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul for the
>>> two developer positions (both due to their central involvement across
>>> SER), N. (sip at arcdiv.com) as a user community representative (due to
>>> long-time and valuable serusers activity), and Martin Hoffmann as a user
>>> community representative (due to his strong SER credentials as book
>>> auther, long-term developer and operator of service provider
>>> installations).
>>> 
>>> As Raphael has already accepted his nomination as a SEMS
>>> representative/developer, I only nominate four.
>>> g-)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> SIP wrote:
>>>> You ought to stick up a page on the Iptel site somewhere to keep track
>>>> of who's been nominated perhaps, so people could reference it when
>>>> deciding their votes. Just an idea.
>>>>
>>>> I nominate Greger to keep track of all of this voting nominating
>>>> stuff! Seconded? ;)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> N.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Greger Viken Teigre wrote:
>>>>> Why should voting be secret? We strive openness and transparency in
>>>>> decision processes by making decisions through consensus on the
>>>>> mailing lists. I think secret voting should have a very clear
>>>>> rationale in order to prefer it.
>>>>> g-)
>>>>> ------- Original message -------
>>>>> From: Martin Hoffmann <hn at nvnc.de>
>>>>> Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org, serdev at lists.iptel.org, semsdev at iptel.org
>>>>> Sent: 18.5.'07,  10:54
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>> Greger V. Teigre wrote:
>>>>>>   
>>>>>>> I have received private questions on how to nominate and vote.  My
>>>>>>> interpretation is that nobody has suggested that we nominate and
>>>>>>> vote using another procedure than default in consensus building:
>>>>>>> posting to the list.
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>> I think it is one main feature of all this voting business to be
>>>>>> secret.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Martin
>>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Serusers mailing list
>>>>> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Serusers mailing list
>>> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>> 
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Serdev mailing list
>>Serdev at lists.iptel.org
>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev



--
Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/