[Serusers] NAT Handling - SER behind a router

[sip]

Incidentally, there are two sets of logs on a Solaris box you might try. 
/var/log/syslog  and /var/adm/messages

N. 


On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:26:09 +0100, Greger V. Teigre wrote
> If you forward like this:
> Public IP  ---> Private IP
> 
> You should forward port 5060 + the UDP range used in rtpproxy/mediaproxy.
> Use advertised_address directive in addition to listen.
> The standard getting started NAT configs assumes that you have no 
> local user agents, and just do far-end NAT traversal. g-)
> 
> TZieleniewski wrote:
> > Hi!!
> >
> > Right now I have SER based voip system but inside the local network.
> > I would like to enable the external internet connection.
> > Is it possible to realize the NAT handling but with SER-RTPProxy or 
> > SER-MediaProxy
> > not with the public IP so still in the local net but with the strict 
> > forwarding rules on the router.
> > where router ofcaurse has the public IP
> > So that for instance having SER and media proxy  inside local network but
> > with whole SIP traffic routed to SER and RTP to media proxy??
> >
> > Is one of the above methods more recommened at the moment with ser2??
> >
> > Thank you in advance
> >
> > Best
> > Tomasz
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers