[Users] Compiling Openser for best performance on Solaris SPARC

[Sergio Gutierrez]

Hi Daniel.

I am repeating the test using 6 instances of SIPp, and I am having a better
performance.

A question. In the page you have listed that the Proxy and UAS runs on a 64
bit machine. Was the compilation done to generate a 64 bit executable?

Thanks.

Kind regards.

Sergio Gutierrez

On 3/21/07, Sergio Gutierrez <saguti at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel.
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> My configs are as the same used in published tests, and my UAS, as
> described is another instance of Openser.
>
> I will try what you sugest.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Sergio Gutiérrez.
>
> On 3/21/07, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel at voice-system.ro> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > do you use same configs as in published tests? The UAS is another
> > openser with just sending a 200 ok reply or sipp with uas scenario?
> >
> > First check what is the capacity of sipp -- make a very simple config
> > with just sl_send_reply("200","ok") in main route and start sipp. See
> > what results you get and that should be the reference for sipp capacity.
> > Also, try to use multiple instances of sipp, from different servers, see
> >
> > if you get the cumulative value better.
> >
> > The tests were done on Core2 processor, and parallel execution of
> > openser processes has some impact as well.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Daniel
> >
> >
> > On 03/21/07 16:52, Sergio Gutierrez wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > Currently I am installing Openser 1.2.0 on a Sun Fire T2000 running
> > > Solaris 10.
> > > Although I used an optimized version of GCC for SPARC Systems, and
> > > used the recommended settings to generate accurate code for my
> > > Processor (UltraSPARC T1), the results of the performance tests are
> > > just 50% of the presented ones on the web page.
> > >
> > > My setup is the following:
> > >
> > > Proxy and UAS: Sun Fire T2000, 8 GB RAM, 1 UltraSPARC T1 1.2 GHZ 6
> > Core.
> > > UAC's: Two domain of a Sun Fire 12K, 4 GB RAM, 4 UlraSPARC III+ 900
> > Mhz
> > > Software versions listed as on the webpage.
> > >
> > > openser -V output:
> > > version: openser 1.2.0-notls (sparc/solaris)
> > > flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST,
> > > SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT-NOSMP
> > > ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
> > > MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
> > > poll method support: poll, select, /dev/poll.
> > > svnrevision: unknown
> > > @(#) $Id: main.c 1827 2007-03-12 15:22:53Z bogdan_iancu $
> > > main.c compiled on 21:43:51 Mar 19 2007 with gcc 4.0.3
> > >
> > >
> > > I would thank any idea about how could I improve the performnace of my
> > > setup. I think that because of the hardware specifications, the result
> > > should be at least equal than listed.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance.
> > >
> > > Kind regards.
> > >
> > > Sergio Gutiérrez.
> > >
> > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Users mailing list
> > > Users at openser.org
> > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> > >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20070321/3ab501e2/attachment.htm>