[Users] codec translation

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello Atle,

On 02/15/07 13:33, Atle Samuelsen wrote:
> Hi Again Daniel :)
>
>   
>> I think the best is to get integrated in the trunk. We hate maintaining patches, because are very time consuming. If it is a 
>> very useful feature or complies with standards it is no reason to keep it as patch. We go for configuration options to 
>> enable/disable features. It is more easier to have it in the trunk as it gets updated all the time when something internally 
>> changes.
>>
>>     
> This I see, and this what not what I ment :) what I tried to say, is
> that I just want a patch back wich can get applied to ser cvs head. Not
> that you continue to keep it uptodate with ser. Just make it compile,
> and not crash :)
>
>  
>   
>> I am not the maintainer of nathelper module in ser, so I cannot get it there, but with openser is easier, and here we can 
>> help. If you want to release the code for public, we are willing to adopt it in openser.
>>
>>     
>
> That I know Daniel :) And I'm not asking you to put it into the
> nathelper module of ser, I just want a patch wich works against it per
> the date it get's commited into OpenSER. What you guys do after, I dont
> care about :) I just want it to be working against SER at one point of
> time, and then if Maxim wants to put it it, its up to him :)
>   

updating the patch for ser might not be that easy, testing requiring lot 
of time. If someone volunteers to do it, that's fine. Whatever 
fixes/enhancements will be done in openser will be public.

Cheers,
Daniel


> - Atle
>  
>
>