[Serusers] drop and brake in ser.cfg

[SIP]

Weiter Leiter wrote:
>
>
> On 8/6/07, *tzieleniewski* <tzieleniewski at o2.pl 
> <mailto:tzieleniewski at o2.pl>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     Is there any difference in the brake and drop command behavior in
>     ser.cfg??
>
>
> break stops execution of current route, resuming the next outer one 
> (if any), from where the current was invoked.
> drop stops execution of script.
>
> WL.
I'm assuming these are SER 2.0 commands?

Is it possible to have come up with even more convoluted and 
non-intuitive names? Perhaps "frog" and "bunny"  or "seratonin" and 
"cuisinart" ?  I mean, why stop with 'brake,' which is so close to being 
'break' (the command one usually uses in a programming setting to escape 
a loop) and yet... isn't. Or drop... which really doesn't imply to me 
'stop execution' as much as it implies ignore an incoming connection... 
or perhaps delete a table.

N.