[Serusers] deference between rtpproxy and mediaproxy

[Greger V. Teigre]

Yes, You're right. And quite soon the docs will be made more available 
at iptel.org and you (and others) will be allowed to update 
documentation, as well as comment to give input to future versions ;-)
g-)

sip wrote:
> Yet again, we see the value of having good documentation. 
>
> Rtpproxy's is somewhat... lacking. Having a comment in code or in the
> changelog does not equate to good documentation. 
>
> N.
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:52:54 -0400, Andres wrote
>   
>> olivier.taylor wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> wow greger,
>>>
>>> where is the doc about that fonctionality?
>>> Wich version are we talking about?
>>>       
>>  * 2005-02-24   Added support for using more than one rtp proxy, in which
>>  *              case traffic will be distributed evenly among them. 
>> In addition, *              each such proxy can be assigned a weight,
>>  which will specify *              which share of the traffic should 
>> be placed to this particular *              proxy. * *             
>>  Introduce failover mechanism, so that if SER detects that one *     
>>          of many proxies is no longer available it temporarily decreases
>>  *              its weight to 0, so that no traffic will be assigned 
>> to it. *              Such "disabled" proxies are periodically 
>> checked to see if they *              are back to normal in which 
>> case respective weight is restored *              resulting in 
>> traffic being sent to that proxy again. * *              Those 
>> features can be enabled by specifying more than one "URI" *          
>>     in the rtpproxy_sock parameter, optionally followed by the 
>> weight, *              which if absent is assumed to be 1, for example:
>>  *
>>  *              rtpproxy_sock="unix:/foo/bar=4 udp:1.2.3.4:3456=3 
>> udp:5.6.7.8:5432=1"
>>
>> This has been available for over a year now.
>>
>>     
>>> Olivier
>>>
>>> Greger V. Teigre a écrit :
>>>
>>>       
>>>> FYI: The newest version of rtpproxy can do load balancing...
>>>> g-)
>>>>         
>> -- 
>> Andres
>> Technical Support
>> http://www.telesip.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20060912/4abe16ba/attachment.htm>