[Serusers] deference between rtpproxy and mediaproxy
sip
sip at arcdiv.com
Mon Sep 11 20:28:56 CEST 2006
Yet again, we see the value of having good documentation.
Rtpproxy's is somewhat... lacking. Having a comment in code or in the
changelog does not equate to good documentation.
N.
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:52:54 -0400, Andres wrote
> olivier.taylor wrote:
>
> > wow greger,
> >
> > where is the doc about that fonctionality?
> > Wich version are we talking about?
>
> * 2005-02-24 Added support for using more than one rtp proxy, in which
> * case traffic will be distributed evenly among them.
> In addition, * each such proxy can be assigned a weight,
> which will specify * which share of the traffic should
> be placed to this particular * proxy. * *
> Introduce failover mechanism, so that if SER detects that one *
> of many proxies is no longer available it temporarily decreases
> * its weight to 0, so that no traffic will be assigned
> to it. * Such "disabled" proxies are periodically
> checked to see if they * are back to normal in which
> case respective weight is restored * resulting in
> traffic being sent to that proxy again. * * Those
> features can be enabled by specifying more than one "URI" *
> in the rtpproxy_sock parameter, optionally followed by the
> weight, * which if absent is assumed to be 1, for example:
> *
> * rtpproxy_sock="unix:/foo/bar=4 udp:1.2.3.4:3456=3
> udp:5.6.7.8:5432=1"
>
> This has been available for over a year now.
>
> >
> > Olivier
> >
> > Greger V. Teigre a écrit :
> >
> >> FYI: The newest version of rtpproxy can do load balancing...
> >> g-)
> >
>
> --
> Andres
> Technical Support
> http://www.telesip.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
More information about the sr-users
mailing list