[Serusers] nat + MESSAGE packets

[Vaclav Kubart]

Interesting problem... I have no idea, but might be that you are
removing something from message bodies using a regular expresion, which
works in this way for PUBLISH bodies...

	Vaclav


On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 07:02:50PM +0200, samuel wrote:
> I'm having some "nice" interaction between UA and SIP proxies regarding NAT.
> Beside's the classical "I put myself in the middle re-writting
> Contact, m and c lines, etc..." this nice boxes also, from time to
> time, remove the bodies of some PUBLISH messages..
> 
> I had only this evening and might have reached wrong conclusions but I
> can't make it work with routers in the middle although it worked in
> the internal LAN and I can see the messages following the right path
> up to the routers.....what might be the reason?!?!?!?8-)
> 
> Nated,
> 
> Samuel.
> 
> 2006/10/20, Vaclav Kubart <vaclav.kubart at iptel.org>:
> >I think so (it is needed to rewrite Contact in SUBSCRIBE and responses
> >to NOTIFY), but has anybody tried presence server with users behind NAT?
> >
> >        Vaclav
> >
> >On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 04:14:37PM +0700, Andrey Kuprianov wrote:
> >> Btw, Greger, does the same go for SUBSCRIBE and NOTIFY requests?
> >>
> >> On 10/20/06, Greger V. Teigre <greger at teigre.com> wrote:
> >> >MESSAGE should be NAT-handled as an INVITE.
> >> >g-)
> >> >
> >> >Mark Price wrote:
> >> >Hi,
> >> >
> >> >I'm finding that my ser clients can't can only unreliably communicate 
> >using
> >> >MESSAGE packets, and that presence and presence subscriptions are 
> >equally
> >> >unreliable (i.e. very).
> >> >The odd thing is that they do sometimes, in fact, work.
> >> >Anyways, I discovered that there are definitely NAT issues going on, 
> >since
> >> >I
> >> >can see inbound MESSAGE packets banging on the outside of my firewall.
> >> >What are people doing to mitigate this?
> >> >
> >> >Mark
> >> >________________________________
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Serusers
> >> >mailing
> >> >list
> >> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >> >
> >> >_______________________________________________
> >> >Serusers mailing list
> >> >Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Serusers mailing list
> >> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >_______________________________________________
> >Serusers mailing list
> >Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >