[Serusers] Weird Signaling

[Gustavo Passos Tourinho]

Hi There

Yeap, ACK should be forwarded to callee. In fact, the proxy is doing 
such thing. But, when it does, it puts a route at the end of ACK message.

Actually I have a "record_route()" function.

Ill try to read more about ser.cfg to find out some solution.

Thanks,
Tourinho

Andrey Kuprianov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sure. It should forward ACK to the callee, right? Otherwise, how can
> the callee know whether the connection is established properly (i.e.
> 3-way handshake, unless your transport is TCP) :)
>
> Plus, ACK is a request, isnt it? You configuration file probably has
> this part somewhere at the beginning:
>
> if(method!="REGISTER") {
>     record_route();
> };
>
> This means that SER will attach route headers to every request except 
> REGISTER.
>
>   Good luck,
>
>     Andrey.
>
>
>
> On 11/13/06, Gustavo Passos Tourinho 
> <gustavo.passos.tourinho at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hey There.
>>
>> I'm having a weird signaling. When the proxy receives an ACK from 
>> caller, it puts an route at the end of packet and then forwards it.
>>
>> I have no idea what i could be.
>>
>> Does anyone have a clue?
>>
>> Thanks in advanced,
>> Tourinho
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>