[Serusers] Re: Fw: [Users] TM : retransmission timers

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Andrei,

just *one* reply from my side, as I really do not like to get into this 
discussion.

First of all I say all your opinions and statements about openser are 
based on a glimpse over the project and they reflect neither that you 
really understand it, nor you followed all the changes and improvements 
we had.

So, please excuse me, but I cannot find as valid statements your sayings 
like : ser is faster, ser has more in core, ser has these and these..... 
Of course, in your quest, you forgot to take into account all the 
clean-up and speed-ups in acc, usrloc, register, tm , etc module -core 
also-, the new feature and modules, that openser had PV from the 
beginning or the fact that most ser's adds-on actually followed the 
original roadmap of openser (posted on the web site). But I do not 
accuse you, because it is not your job to follow openser's evolution, so 
things may escape you.

So, let us talk about things we really know. And do not think that the 
difference between ser and openser it's only about code....a project is 
not only the code..it is policy and attitude and respect regarding the 
community.

Definitely we will try to consider the things you found unjust (like 
mentioning the project along the contributor's name). We do not want to 
bother anybody - in fact you probably notice that from openser side 
there was no negative posts (about ser) on the mailing list or web - 
just the truth with your own words. I really do not understand your 
attitude :(.

I just wanted to express my opinion about this discussion which 
hopefully goes to an end.

All the best regards,
Bogdan

Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:

>On Nov 23, 2006 at 11:43, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at> wrote:
>
>[...] 
>  
>
>>>I've tried looking at openser core & tm commits and I haven't seen any
>>>significant changes (and this is not a flamewar attempt).
>>>      
>>>
>>Aren't the pseudo variables vs. select framework significant changes? 
>>Also TLS in core vs. TLS as module?
>>    
>>
>
>
>Ok. I've meant openser core vs ser 0.9.4, or if you want what openser
>core has extra compared to ser 0.10.99 (speaking of bigger features,
>probably only the statistics part and the new MI, which seems to
>correspond to ser's RPC, so I wouldn't call it an extra, but
>re-inventing the wheel).
>If we are talking the other way arround, ser core has evolved much more
> (avps in script, select, timers, dns, blacklist a.s.o).
>That's one of the reason I'm suggesting that it would be a good ideea
> to switch to it (and at least tm), besides performance tunning and
> extra-testing.
>
>
>[...]
>
>
>Andrei
>
>_______________________________________________
>Users mailing list
>Users at openser.org
>http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>  
>