[Serusers] NAT and Contact header vs RFC3261

Mihaly Zachar zmihaly at madein.hu
Tue May 23 15:28:35 CEST 2006


Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Mihaly Zachar wrote:
> 
>> Hi Everybody,
>>
>> I have a new SIP UA, what (related to RFC3261 -> 10.2.4) needs the 
>> same Concact header in the incoming "200 OK", what was sent out.
>>
>>
>> I have found this thread about the topic:
>>
>> http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2005-March/016164.html
>>
>> Can sy help me to implement this ??
>> Do sy have a working example, how can I avoid the NAT problem ?
>>
>> I use nathelper and SER 0.9.4..
> 
> 
> use fix_nated_register() instead of fix_nated_contact()

Thanks for the quick answer...

I have tried that, but unfortunately I checked a wrong database :(((

It works well now!!


Thanks,
Misi




More information about the sr-users mailing list