[Serusers] NAT and Contact header vs RFC3261

Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Tue May 23 14:20:45 CEST 2006


Mihaly Zachar wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
> 
> I have a new SIP UA, what (related to RFC3261 -> 10.2.4) needs the same 
> Concact header in the incoming "200 OK", what was sent out.
> 
> 
> I have found this thread about the topic:
> 
> http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2005-March/016164.html
> 
> Can sy help me to implement this ??
> Do sy have a working example, how can I avoid the NAT problem ?
> 
> I use nathelper and SER 0.9.4..

use fix_nated_register() instead of fix_nated_contact()

regards
klaus




More information about the sr-users mailing list