[Serusers] PA error sending notifies

[Vaclav Kubart]

> First of all, I have to thank you for the time you spent writing the
> handbook, it's really really helpfull....I wish all SER related parts
> had this docs..

Thanks. :-) It is nice to hear something like that.

> 
> I'll try to get familiar with the code of the notifications and I'll
> try to find something....which I don't thing so :P. I'll also merge
> the two functionalities (proxy + presence) in a unique config file to
> see if it works.
> I hope I can provide more info these following days.

Thanks.

> 
> About the missing things in the presence handbook, probably the most
> important is the new xcap module because in the sample config files
> it's missing.

You are right, but in the "compiled" version of presence handbook
(published on iptel's ftp) is described current presence snapshot
which doesn't have xcap module. 

In the source version of the handbook (in directory doc/presence of SER
source tree) is the description still missing too, but will be added
soon. :-)

> Another thing is that in the XCAP structure description, the im-rules
> directory is missing, which might lead to misunderstandings. I
> downloaded the structure from the iptel's ftp and inside the im-rules
> there were several files corresponding to presence-rules which should
> be either removed or updated with the im-rules namespaces and removing
> the whitelist.

Thanks! I will correct it.

By the way, "im-rules" are NOT standardized in any way - we (at iptel)
only needed something like that, so it is there...

	Vaclav

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Samuel.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 2006/5/15, Vaclav Kubart <vaclav.kubart at iptel.org>:
> >Hi,
> >this problem I'm trying to solve with Ilker Aktuna. I try to simulate it
> >on my machine and let you know. Or if you solve it, please let me know.
> >:-)
> >
> >Please, could you tell me, what things you were missing in presence
> >handbook? I'm trying to do it as useful as possible and whatever ideas
> >are welcome...
> >
> >        Vaclav
> >
> >On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 01:38:02PM +0200, samuel wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I recently had a few hours and start installing the presence staff and
> >> I have to say that I have it amost workign thanks to the presence
> >> handbook, the mailing list and, obviously, a little bit of code
> >> review..:P
> >>
> >> I have two SER instances, the "proxy" and the "presence server" (both
> >> with last CVS code) co-located in the same host and I have an issue
> >> when the "presence server" tries to send the NOTIFY requests. Below
> >> there's an attched log showing the problem (on IP a.b.c.d I've got the
> >> two instances):
> >>
> >> 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:378: sending winfo notify
> >> 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:383: winfo document created
> >> 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:391: creating headers
> >> 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:398: headers created
> >> 3(30682) DEBUG:tm:t_uac:
> >> next_hop=<sip:a.b.c.d;transport=tcp;ftag=c77b3f33;lr=on>
> >> 3(30682) t_uac: no socket found
> >> 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:402: request sent with result -7
> >> 3(30682) ERROR: notify.c:404: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7)
> >>
> >> This problem appears in other places, not only in the notifications
> >> for winfo so probably there's somthing in the selection of the
> >> outgoing socket directing to the local IP.
> >>
> >> >From the proxy part I just ust t_forward_nonack for the "SIMPLE"
> >> messages with record route....maybe adding the port in the record
> >> route should help?
> >>
> >>
> >> Samuel.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Serusers mailing list
> >> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >