[Serusers] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP X.X.X.X; branch=0

[Klaus Darilion]

Carlos Loarca wrote:
> Hi Klaus, when I run the command "ngrep -d any" I get

I meant to use the -d any parameter to sniff also on the loopnack 
interface. You should also have a filter, e.g:

ngrep -d any port 5060

If you do not see any SIP requests with the above command, then there 
are other problems :-)

regards
klaus

> olny irrelevant packets like
> 
> #
> T 83.140.44.243:22 -> 83.140.44.242:32965 [AP]
>   ,...............AL.
> ..xI.b.V...........#.$../.KN.;.......e....".P.5.6.8....
>   .s.{#.`..R.....U4.......}.A.+.l....92
> exit
> 9313 received, 75 dropped
> 
> Is that the command I should use???
> 
> Cheers,
> /Carlos
> 
> --- Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at>
> wrote:
> 
>> To debug this, we would need a complete ngrep trace
>> and ser.cfg (remove 
>> sensitive information like passwords)
>>
>> regards
>> klaus
>>
>> Carlos Loarca wrote:
>>> Yes Klaus, it seems that it is looping. but the
>>> strange behaviour occurs when there is a
>> missdialled
>>> call and gets the error message from other
>> equipment
>>> (ie. voip gateway). Otherwise, the ser performance
>> is
>>> correct.
>>>
>>> Any clue?. I have checked my traces and the
>> repeated
>>> ACK coming from the voip-gateway has the right Via
>> and
>>> the ACK sent my ser are ok as well. Where can the
>>> problem be?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> /Carlos
>>>
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com