[Users] Accounting wrong BYEs
Klaus Darilion
klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Thu Jul 20 12:32:15 CEST 2006
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> was referring to a forking scenario:
>
> UAC P UAS
> <----------------- 180 from UAS1
> <-------------- <----------------- 183 from
> UAS1
> <--------------
> <----------------- 180 from UAS2
> <---x---x---x-- this will not be relayed to UAC since a
> higher reply code was already sent,
> so the UAS2 will not be visible
>
> regards,
> bogdan
>
> Klaus Darilion wrote:
>
>>>
>>>
>>> First of all the UAC may not discover all the branches based on
>>> To-tag - there might be branches that haven't sent any reply, or
>>> replies were absorbed by the forking server (ex: 180 after 183 will
>>> not be relayed).
Is this standard conform? What about
UAC P UAS
<----------------- 183 from UAS1 <--------------
???? 180 from UAS1 <--------------
Will this be forwarded?
klaus
>>
>>
>> Really? Why not? This is strictly valid and make sense. All gateways
>> does this:
>> INVITE --> SETUP
>> ...
>> 183 <-- PROGRESS w/ inband audio
>> 180 <-- ALERTING
>>
>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list