[Serusers] Seperate SER and Oubound Proxy

[Mark Aiken]

The basic problem you run into is when you separate the registrar function
from the far-end NAT traversal function.

I decided not to pursue the for now but was looking at using the Path header
as one possible solution. I guess there are other, simpler solutions,
depending on your SER configuration and network architecture.

As far as I can tell, most commercial SBCs are also B2BUAs so they solve the
problem in a completely different way.

Mark

On 9/26/05, Kevin Brennan <kevin.brennan at redsquared.com> wrote:
>
> We would like to use STUN as preferred NAT traversal method but for
> those situations where STUN does not work we would offer an outbound
> proxy (configured in user agent). We would like to keep the NAT
> traversal proxy completely separate from SER. I wonder has anybody
> implemented this ? how ? and any other suggestions/feedback.
>
> Br /Kevin Brennan.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20050926/020d06aa/attachment.htm>