[Serusers] Urgent NAT question: mediaproxy,rtp or STUN ?

[a cairo]

Thanks Adrian.
My opinion is that MEDIAPROXY it's necessary for my purpose (more than 1000 
users on ser !!!) but radius auth supported only in businnes version 
(7000,00 eur) !

Have you a solution for mediaproxy with radius auth ?

Can anyone help me for this NAT problem?
Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Georgescu <ag at ag-projects.com>
To: ser users <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:14:19 +0100
Subject: [Serusers] Urgent NAT question: mediaproxy,rtp or STUN ?

> Antonello,
> 
> There is no better solution for all possible cases. The solutions have 
> differences explained in the readme files for example RTP proxy can 
> take more load per server, Media Proxy can distribute load on multiple 
> boxes based on DNS SRV records and STUN can help your Stun enabled 
> clients to traverse the NAT in majority of cases but not all. So a 
> combination between STUN plus one of the relay solutions will cover all
> cases. Configuring per session when to use Stun or a media relay is 
> quite a daunting task given the number of possible call flow scenarios 
> so if you wish that your calls always work regardless of UA type or 
> call flow you will enable a media relay because Stun is not reliable 
> 100%.
> 
> Adrian
> 
>  >>>>>>>>>>
> 
> Terrible question:
> Is mediaproxy better than rtp or STUN server for NAT problem ???
> 
> Radius Authentication work fine with Mediaproxy, STUN and RTP ?
> In Mediaproxy Server, radius auth supported only in non-free version
> (7.000,00 euro) !
> 
> My work is:
> 
> Private Network for more than 1000 users
> Public SER SERVER
> Public Radius+MySQL
> Public Patton MediaGW
> 
> Please, answer !
> Thanks
> Antonello
>