[Serusers] Urgent NAT question: mediaproxy,rtp or STUN ?

[Adrian Georgescu]

Antonello,

There is no better solution for all possible cases. The solutions have 
differences explained in the readme files for example RTP proxy can 
take more load per server, Media Proxy can distribute load on multiple 
boxes based on DNS SRV records and STUN can help your Stun enabled 
clients to traverse the NAT in majority of cases but not all. So a 
combination between STUN plus one of the relay solutions will cover all 
cases. Configuring per session when to use Stun or a media relay is 
quite a daunting task given the number of possible call flow scenarios 
so if you wish that your calls always work regardless of UA type or 
call flow you will enable a media relay because Stun is not reliable 
100%.

Adrian

 >>>>>>>>>>

Terrible question:
Is mediaproxy better than rtp or STUN server for NAT problem ???

Radius Authentication work fine with Mediaproxy, STUN and RTP ?
In Mediaproxy Server, radius auth supported only in non-free version
(7.000,00 euro) !

My work is:

Private Network for more than 1000 users
Public SER SERVER
Public Radius+MySQL
Public Patton MediaGW

Please, answer !
Thanks
Antonello
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 1211 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20051120/49599424/attachment.bin>