[Serusers] Re: [Users] AVPs are lost on relayed INVITE errors

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Federico,

use avp_print() (works only with debug=9)  in failure_route to inspect 
the list of present AVP. maybe you do not have the AVPs you are trying 
to log.

regards,
bogdan

Federico Giannici wrote:

> Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> have you set the flag to log missed transaction?
>> http://openser.org/docs/modules/1.0.x/acc.html#AEN407
>
>
> No, I set the following:
>
> modparam("acc", "db_flag", 1)
> modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", 1)
>
> But no "db_missed_flag".
> Anyway:
>
> 1) I don't want to log missed calls in a separate table.
>
> 2) The failed INVITEs are actually logged in the normal table, but the 
> AVPs I set are not logged (it seems that they are not found).
>
> In normal cases the AVP are correctly logged. Even in many error cases 
> (404, and so on) they are logged too. But in some cases, with strange 
> errors (488, 422), the AVPs are NOT logged (accounting is done, but 
> AVPs are "n\a")!
>
> Any explanation of this?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>> Or is that the some avps are not any more stored for failed 
>> transaction? Maybe some snippets of your config will give us more 
>> hints about what happens there.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 11/26/05 14:04, Federico Giannici wrote:
>>
>>> I'm using OpenSER 1.0.0 on OpenBSD 3.7 amd64.
>>>
>>> I have a strange problem with the accounting: I set a couple of AVPs 
>>> for every message that arrives at the server. I'm sure they are 
>>> there because they are written in the syslog logging. Sometimes, 
>>> when an INVITE is relayed (with transactions) and receives an error 
>>> (488, 422, etc.), in the SQL logging there is no more presence of 
>>> the AVPs!
>>> Is this a known problem?
>>> How can I avoid this?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>
>
>