[Serusers] Ser+Nat +Polycom phones

[Jan Janak]

On 29-05-2005 15:54, Greger V. Teigre wrote:
> The patch was current for rtpproxy from repository at that point. I sent 
> the patch to Maxim and asked if it could be included in CVS, but I never 
> heard from him.

  Please re-send it. The amount of mail traffic we get is big and
  sometimes it gets lost (at least it happens to me).

    Jan.

>    If you add the patch by hand, you should be able to make rtpproxy 
> announce the public IP in the INVITEs and OKs (instead of rtpproxy's 
> private/interface address).
> g-)
> 
> harry gaillac wrote:
> >I tried to patch main.c without success according to
> >main.c.rej but i try to add -i by hand.
> >
> >I failed to patch main.c .
> >
> >If I add -i options to rtpproxy will it solve problem
> >of signaling behind nat (on same box) ?
> >
> >
> >Harry
> >
> >--- "Greger V. Teigre" <greger at teigre.com> a écrit :
> >
> >>
> >http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2005-January/014688.html
> >>harry gaillac wrote:
> >>>Where can I get your patch ?
> >>>
> >>>Harry
> >>>--- "Greger V. Teigre" <greger at teigre.com> a écrit
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Running rtpproxy on a NATed box is a problem (you
> >>>>need a patch I posted a
> >>>>while back to announce the correct public IP).
> >>>>Running all daemons on the
> >>>>same server with a public IP is NOT a problem.
> >>>>g-)
> >>>>harry gaillac wrote:
> >>>>>Hello,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>SER+nathelper+rtpproxy run on the same box that
> >>>>nat.
> >>>>>Is it a problem ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Harry
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>--- "Greger V. Teigre" <greger at teigre.com> a
> >>écrit
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>That's strange. We are using some Polycom 300
> >>and
> >>>>>>they work ok. No STUN
> >>>>>>support and sometimes a very erratic
> >>registration
> >>>>>>pattern, but except from
> >>>>>>that, they seem to perform ok.  They
> >>interoperate
> >>>>>>with sipuras,
> >>>>>>grandstreams, sjphone, cisco gw, xlite, etc.
> >>>>>>g-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Juha Heinanen wrote:
> >>>>>>>harry,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>we tried polycom video phones a month or so ago and their sip
> >>>>>>>implementation was worst i had seen so far. the phones didn't
> >>>>>>>support digest authentication and we were also hit the
> >>>>>>problem you mentioned
> >>>>>>>with domain in request-uri.  i suggest to junk
> >>>>>>those phones before
> >>>>>>>their sip implementation is closer to rfc3261.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>-- juha
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>Serusers mailing list
> >>>>>>>serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >>>>>>>
> >>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >_____________________________________________________________________________
> >>>>>Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 1 Go d'espace
> >>>>de stockage pour vos
> >>>>>mails, photos et vidéos ! Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur
> >>>>>http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >_____________________________________________________________________________
> >>>Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 1 Go d'espace
> >>de stockage pour vos
> >>>mails, photos et vidéos ! Créez votre Yahoo! Mail
> >>sur
> >>>http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_____________________________________________________________________________
> >Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 1 Go d'espace de stockage pour vos
> >mails, photos et vidéos ! Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur
> >http://fr.mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers