[Serusers] Nat+SER

[Ricardo Martinez]

Hello.
	There was an interesting discussion about the same issue.
	Check by Subject : [Serusers] STUN server  on April 4. (you can
check the mailing list)

Regards,
Ricardo.-

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: info at beeplove.com [mailto:info at beeplove.com]
> Enviado el: Jueves, 05 de Mayo de 2005 10:41
> Para: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Asunto: RE: [Serusers] Nat+SER
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I have a simple question, if i am using stun server if there any need
> to use mediaproxy or rtpproxy, for users sitting behind routers ??
> and if yes which one is the better choise to do that (mediaproxy or
> rtpproxy)?
> 
> Thanks for help.
> 
> 
> Stun server takes care of your clients who are behind 
> Assymetric NAT. It
> also depends on client. Like, your cleints may not be forced 
> to use STUN
> server.
> Also, if your client use STUN, you need to use 
> [Media/RTP]Proxy to cover
> users who are from Symetric NAT.
> >From my personal experience, I found MediaProxy easy to 
> configure and have
> some very good features. It doesn't mean RTPProxy is not good. I just
> couldn't make RTPProxy worked. Maybe I was not that familiar with
> RTPProxy/SER when I tried it.
> Well, after MediaProxy worked, I didn't try RTPProxy again.
> 
> MOhammad
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web - Check your email from the web at
> http://mail2web.com/ .
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>