[Serusers] check_ser plugin for nagios.

[Ricardo Martinez]

Hello.
	Thanks for your answers.  Finally i was able to monitor my SER with
NAGIOS and SIPSAK, maybe not a easy task for those who never used NAGIOS.
I'm aware that sipsak support NAGIOS compliant responses, but despite of
this the interaction between NAGIOS and SIPSAK is not so clear.
I used the script that i found in
http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2004-January/005195 with some
modifications for the anwswers.
I would like to ask one more question.  What other kind of test would be
useful to monitor SER using NAGIOS?
Can i use sipsak to monitor a B2BUA?
Thanks!

Ricardo.-

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Matt Schulte [mailto:mschulte at netlogic.net]
> Enviado el: Lunes, 02 de Mayo de 2005 11:45
> Para: Edgardo O. Gonzales II; Ricardo Martinez; serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Asunto: RE: [Serusers] check_ser plugin for nagios.
> 
> 
> I just implemented sipsak this morning for Nagios, sipsak natively
> supports Nagios compliant responses. This accomplishes the following
> that check_tcp doesn't.
> 
> layer7 response (layer3 is fine and dandy but why not go all the way)
> checks for correct callflow
> checks authentication (if needed??)
> 
> 
> Ironically enough I just slapped it in and it works fine. 
> sample syntax:
> sipsak -s sip:+10005551234 at full.uri.blah -H your.local.hostname -u
> sip_user -a sip_password -N
> 
> The -N makes it respond in compliance to Nagios.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edgardo O. Gonzales II [mailto:edgardo.g at pacific.net.ph] 
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 7:37 PM
> To: Ricardo Martinez; 'serusers at lists.iptel.org'
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] check_ser plugin for nagios.
> 
> 
> 
> use the tcp check on nagios then monitor the port ex : 5060
> 
> thanks,
> ed
> 
> At 04:05 AM 4/30/2005, Ricardo Martinez wrote:
> >Hello list.
> >         I'm trying to use nagios to check my ser status, so far i 
> >found a script in : 
> >http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2004-January/005195.
html  and 
>i tested it without any luck.  Does someone have any check_ser that 
>works ok?. I will really appreciate.
>
>Thanks
>
>Ricardo Martinez.-
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers at lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers