[Serusers] Anonymization/uac-module questions

[Marian Dumitru]

Hi Andreas,

please see my comments inline

Best regards,
Marian

Andreas Granig wrote:
> Hi again!
> 
> Elena-Ramona Modroiu wrote:
> 
>> I just commited the part that should fix the <> issue. Please let me 
>> know if it works now.
> 
> 
> Ok, thanks, the <> issue is fixed. But... :o)
> 
> Two other points:
> 
> - The original display name isn't encoded, and thus can't be restored. 
> Could this be an issue for UACs matching the whole From-Header?

The display name must not be involved in transaction matching. If I 
understand correctly the RFC 3261, only the URI part of FROM must be used.

> - For a subsequent request with interchanged From/To (like a BYE from 
> the the called party) you have to *restore* the To-URI of the request 
> and *replace* the To-URI of the response. The latter isn't supported by 
> the module. So we'd need a uac_replace_to which can be called from a 
> reply route. It's getting complicated here ;o)

yes, we are aware of this bug. I already discussed with Romona about 
this problem and will be fixed soon.

> 
> Andy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 

-- 
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro