Re: FW: [Serusers] calls between UA´s b ehind same NAT us ing nathelper/rtpproxy
Rafael J. Risco G.V.
rafael.risco at gmail.com
Thu Mar 17 22:50:13 CET 2005
Hi
using this nathelper configuration (please see below) , where I
should place this code using avpops?
ser.cfg:
#
# ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------
debug=5 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd)
fork=yes
log_stderror=yes # (cmd line: -E)
check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v)
dns=no # (cmd. line: -r)
rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R)
port=5060
children=4
fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
# ------------------ module loading ----------------------------------
# Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/avpops.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so"
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so"
# Uncomment this if you want digest authentication
# mysql.so must be loaded !
#loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so"
#loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so"
# !! Nathelper
loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so"
# ----------------- setting module-specific parameters ---------------
# -- usrloc params --
# modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0)
# Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database
# for persistent storage and comment the previous line
modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2)
# -- auth params --
# Uncomment if you are using auth module
#
#modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes)
#
# If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config),
# uncomment also the following parameter)
#
#modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password")
# -- rr params --
# add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy
modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
# !! Nathelper
modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6)
modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) # Ping interval 30 s
modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # Ping only clients behind NAT
# ------------------------- request routing logic -------------------
# main routing logic
route{
# initial sanity checks -- messages with
# max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests
if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
break;
};
if (msg:len >= max_len ) {
sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big");
break;
};
# !! Nathelper
# Special handling for NATed clients; first, NAT test is
# executed: it looks for via!=received and RFC1918 addresses
# in Contact (may fail if line-folding is used); also,
# the received test should, if completed, should check all
# vias for rpesence of received
if (nat_uac_test("3")) {
# Allow RR-ed requests, as these may indicate that
# a NAT-enabled proxy takes care of it; unless it is
# a REGISTER
if (method == "REGISTER" || ! search("^Record-Route:")) {
log("LOG: Someone trying to register from private IP, rewriting\n");
# This will work only for user agents that support symmetric
# communication. We tested quite many of them and majority is
# smart enough to be symmetric. In some phones it takes a configuration
# option. With Cisco 7960, it is called NAT_Enable=Yes, with kphone it is
# called "symmetric media" and "symmetric signalling".
fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite contact with source IP of signalling
if (method == "INVITE") {
fix_nated_sdp("1"); # Add direction=active to SDP
};
force_rport(); # Add rport parameter to topmost Via
setflag(6); # Mark as NATed
};
};
# we record-route all messages -- to make sure that
# subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's
# particularly good if upstream and downstream entities
# use different transport protocol
if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route();
# subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the
# path determined by record-routing
if (loose_route()) {
# mark routing logic in request
append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n");
route(1);
break;
};
if (!uri==myself) {
# mark routing logic in request
append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n");
route(1);
break;
};
# if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc
# (in case, it does not work, use the following command
# with proper names and addresses in it)
if (uri==myself) {
if (method=="REGISTER") {
# Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication
# if (!www_authorize("iptel.org", "subscriber")) {
# www_challenge("iptel.org", "0");
# break;
# };
save("location");
break;
};
lookup("aliases");
if (!uri==myself) {
append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n");
route(1);
break;
};
# native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB
if (!lookup("location")) {
sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found");
break;
};
};
append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n");
route(1);
}
route[1]
{
# !! Nathelper
if (uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)" &&
!search("^Route:")){
sl_send_reply("479", "We don't forward to private IP addresses");
break;
};
# if client or server know to be behind a NAT, enable relay
if (isflagset(6)) {
force_rtp_proxy();
};
# NAT processing of replies; apply to all transactions (for example,
# re-INVITEs from public to private UA are hard to identify as
# NATed at the moment of request processing); look at replies
t_on_reply("1");
# send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably
# even for UDP2TCP
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
};
}
# !! Nathelper
onreply_route[1] {
# NATed transaction ?
if (isflagset(6) && status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") {
fix_nated_contact();
force_rtp_proxy();
# otherwise, is it a transaction behind a NAT and we did not
# know at time of request processing ? (RFC1918 contacts)
} else if (nat_uac_test("1")) {
fix_nated_contact();
};
}
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 21:00:59 -0500, Java Rockx <javarockx at gmail.com> wrote:
> Jimmy,
>
> This should do the trick. This code uses AVPOPS to determine if the
> source and destination IP addresses are the same.
>
> avp_write("$ruri/domain", "i:33");
> if (avp_check("i:33", "eq/$src_ip/i")) {
> # RTP proxy is not needed because caller
> # and caller are behind the same NAT
> # so set a flag or something to indicate that
> # mediaproxy/rtpproxy are not needed
> };
> avp_delete("i:33");
>
> Regards,
> Paul
>
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:04:08 +0800, jimmy <jimmy_huang at uni.com.tw> wrote:
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jimmy [mailto:jimmy_huang at uni.com.tw]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 10:01 AM
> > To: 'rrisco at millicom.net.pe'
> > Subject: RE: [Serusers] calls between UA´s behind same NAT using
> > nathelper/rtpproxy
> >
> > Hi Rafael:
> > It seems has two way to meet your requirement
> > (1)use external script
> > http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2005-February/015477.html
> > (2)use avpops module
> > http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/
> > Hope it's useful ...
> >
> > Jimmy
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: serusers-bounces at iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On
> > Behalf Of Rafael J. Risco G.V.
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 2:22 AM
> > To: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > Subject: [Serusers] calls between UA´s behind same NAT using
> > nathelper/rtpproxy
> >
> > Hi
> > I would like to know if its possible to comunicate SIP Clients betwen
> > them when they are behind the same nat, I am using
> > Nathelper/RTPProxy...
> >
> > thanks
> > Rafael
> >
> > --
> >
> > rrgv
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
--
rrgv
More information about the sr-users
mailing list