[Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM resources.

[Java Rockx]

That's what I have. I'm not sure what the setflag(1) is for, but then
again, I cannot see the entire ser.cfg.

Regards,
Paul


On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:20:41 -0400, Ricardo Martinez
<rmartinez at redvoiss.net> wrote:
> Hello Paul.
>         I have the next lines for ending media session:
> 
> if (loose_route()) {
>                 if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL")  {
>                         end_media_session();
>                         setflag(1);
>                 };
>                 t_relay();
>                 break;
>         };
> 
> Is this ok?.  I got the idea from a ser.cfg file in the forum.  I'm not so
> sure if this is correct.
> Can someone help me here?
> 
> Thanks again!
> 
> Regards,
> Ricardo
> 
> > -----Mensaje original-----
> > De: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx at gmail.com]
> > Enviado el: Martes, 15 de Marzo de 2005 21:03
> > Para: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM resources.
> >
> >
> > Yes that could help, but if you're experiencing pleny of "idle" RTP
> > connections then you are probably not ending your media sessions with
> > end_media_session().
> >
> > Regards,
> > Paul
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:33:19 -0600, Alberto Cruz
> > <acruz at tekbrain.com> wrote:
> > >  If you are running RedHat 9 and Python 3.2.5 may be this
> > could help you:
> > >
> > >  http://www.python.org/download/download_linux.html
> > >
> > >  Regards
> > >
> > >  Alberto Cruz
> > >
> > >
> > >  Ricardo Martinez wrote:
> > >
> > >  Hello. Returning to this subject. I upgraded to the new
> > mediaproxy version.
> > > 1.2.1, but i still have the same problem. I detected a
> > increasing amount of
> > > RAM memory used by mediaproxy. I don't know what's
> > happening. Is this
> > > something maybe related to the way i tear dow the session,
> > i'm still confuse
> > > with so many IDLE session in my mediaproxy. Can this be the
> > cause of the
> > > increasing amount of RAM memory used? Also, is there a way
> > to debug the
> > > mediaproxy? or something that help me to understand what's
> > going on? Any
> > > help would be appreciated. Thanks Ricardo.-
> > >  -----Mensaje original----- De: Java Rockx
> > [mailto:javarockx at gmail.com]
> > > Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Marzo de 2005 15:23 Para:
> > Ricardo Martinez CC:
> > > serusers at lists.iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM
> > > resources. I'm tearing down my sessions the same way you
> > showed in your
> > > first email. So AFAIK, that is OK. Regards, Paul On Fri, 11 Mar 2005
> > > 16:15:38 -0400, Ricardo Martinez <rmartinez at redvoiss.net> wrote:
> > >  Paul, I was thinking the same, maybe that's the problem.
> > What about the
> > > tear down of the sessions? Thanks! Regards, Ricardo.-
> > >  -----Mensaje original----- De: Java Rockx
> > [mailto:javarockx at gmail.com]
> > > Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Marzo de 2005 15:09 Para:
> > Ricardo Martinez CC:
> > > serusers at lists.iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM
> > > resources. Ricardo, I think the release notes on
> > mediaproxy-1.2 say that
> > > some resource leaks have been fixed. Perhaps you can try version 1.2
> > > Regards, Paul On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:01:59 -0400, Ricardo Martinez
> > > <rmartinez at redvoiss.net> wrote:
> > >  Hello list. I was looking the process in my SER sip-proxy with the
> > > mediaproxy running.
> > >  Every time i look, the percetage of used RAM is
> > increasing. It seems like
> > >  for some reason mediaproxy is not releasing the resources
> > used in RAM. You
> > >  can look this in the next lines : PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS
> > SHARE STAT %CPU
> > > %MEM TIME CPU COMMAND
> > >  1952 root 15 0 284M 266M 1628 S 0.0 26.4 19:22 0
> > >  mediaproxy.py Can someone tell me if this is a bug of
> > mediaproxy or maybe a
> > > missconfiguration in my ser.cfg? I want to ask a question
> > regarding to tear
> > > down sessions with mediaproxy
> > >  also. In my ser.cfg i have : if (loose_route()) { if
> > (method=="BYE" ||
> > > method=="CANCEL") { log(1, "NAT: BYE o CANCEL recibido -->
> > terminando la
> > >  sesion de media\n"); end_media_session(); setflag(1); };
> > t_relay(); break;
> > > }; Is this ok? I think in some cases (i'm still unable to
> > determine which
> > >  ones), SER does not tear down a mediaproxy session. You
> > can see for example
> > >  this two session, both of them were ended, but it seems to
> > be active even
> > >  before that. (i ommited the source, via and destination
> > IP's in the output
> > >  of the session.py) Status Duration Codec Type Traffic
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --------------
> > >  --- hold (2430) 40'40" G729 Audio 11.53k/29.58k/18.45k
> > inactive 0'02"
> > > Unknown Audio 0/0/0 Can someone tell me what's happening?
> > I'm runnig : [root
> > > mediaproxy]# ./mediaproxy.py --version mediaproxy.py 1.0
> > Thanks in advance.
> > > Regards, Ricardo M.
> > _______________________________________________ Serusers
> > > mailing list serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > > _______________________________________________ Serusers
> > mailing list
> > > serusers at lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Serusers mailing list
> > > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
>