[Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM resources.

[Ricardo Martinez]

Hello Paul.
	I have the next lines for ending media session:

if (loose_route()) {
                if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL")  {
                        end_media_session();
                        setflag(1);
                };
                t_relay();
                break;
        };

Is this ok?.  I got the idea from a ser.cfg file in the forum.  I'm not so
sure if this is correct.
Can someone help me here?

Thanks again!

Regards,
Ricardo


> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx at gmail.com]
> Enviado el: Martes, 15 de Marzo de 2005 21:03
> Para: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM resources.
> 
> 
> Yes that could help, but if you're experiencing pleny of "idle" RTP
> connections then you are probably not ending your media sessions with
> end_media_session().
> 
> Regards,
> Paul
> 
> 
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:33:19 -0600, Alberto Cruz 
> <acruz at tekbrain.com> wrote:
> >  If you are running RedHat 9 and Python 3.2.5 may be this 
> could help you:
> >  
> >  http://www.python.org/download/download_linux.html
> >  
> >  Regards
> >  
> >  Alberto Cruz
> > 
> >  
> >  Ricardo Martinez wrote:
> >  
> >  Hello. Returning to this subject. I upgraded to the new 
> mediaproxy version.
> > 1.2.1, but i still have the same problem. I detected a 
> increasing amount of
> > RAM memory used by mediaproxy. I don't know what's 
> happening. Is this
> > something maybe related to the way i tear dow the session, 
> i'm still confuse
> > with so many IDLE session in my mediaproxy. Can this be the 
> cause of the
> > increasing amount of RAM memory used? Also, is there a way 
> to debug the
> > mediaproxy? or something that help me to understand what's 
> going on? Any
> > help would be appreciated. Thanks Ricardo.- 
> >  -----Mensaje original----- De: Java Rockx 
> [mailto:javarockx at gmail.com]
> > Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Marzo de 2005 15:23 Para: 
> Ricardo Martinez CC:
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM
> > resources. I'm tearing down my sessions the same way you 
> showed in your
> > first email. So AFAIK, that is OK. Regards, Paul On Fri, 11 Mar 2005
> > 16:15:38 -0400, Ricardo Martinez <rmartinez at redvoiss.net> wrote: 
> >  Paul, I was thinking the same, maybe that's the problem. 
> What about the
> > tear down of the sessions? Thanks! Regards, Ricardo.- 
> >  -----Mensaje original----- De: Java Rockx 
> [mailto:javarockx at gmail.com]
> > Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Marzo de 2005 15:09 Para: 
> Ricardo Martinez CC:
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org Asunto: Re: [Serusers] Mediaproxy consuming RAM
> > resources. Ricardo, I think the release notes on 
> mediaproxy-1.2 say that
> > some resource leaks have been fixed. Perhaps you can try version 1.2
> > Regards, Paul On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:01:59 -0400, Ricardo Martinez
> > <rmartinez at redvoiss.net> wrote: 
> >  Hello list. I was looking the process in my SER sip-proxy with the
> > mediaproxy running. 
> >  Every time i look, the percetage of used RAM is 
> increasing. It seems like 
> >  for some reason mediaproxy is not releasing the resources 
> used in RAM. You 
> >  can look this in the next lines : PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS 
> SHARE STAT %CPU
> > %MEM TIME CPU COMMAND 
> >  1952 root 15 0 284M 266M 1628 S 0.0 26.4 19:22 0 
> >  mediaproxy.py Can someone tell me if this is a bug of 
> mediaproxy or maybe a
> > missconfiguration in my ser.cfg? I want to ask a question 
> regarding to tear
> > down sessions with mediaproxy 
> >  also. In my ser.cfg i have : if (loose_route()) { if 
> (method=="BYE" ||
> > method=="CANCEL") { log(1, "NAT: BYE o CANCEL recibido --> 
> terminando la 
> >  sesion de media\n"); end_media_session(); setflag(1); }; 
> t_relay(); break;
> > }; Is this ok? I think in some cases (i'm still unable to 
> determine which 
> >  ones), SER does not tear down a mediaproxy session. You 
> can see for example
> >  this two session, both of them were ended, but it seems to 
> be active even 
> >  before that. (i ommited the source, via and destination 
> IP's in the output 
> >  of the session.py) Status Duration Codec Type Traffic
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------------- 
> >  --- hold (2430) 40'40" G729 Audio 11.53k/29.58k/18.45k 
> inactive 0'02"
> > Unknown Audio 0/0/0 Can someone tell me what's happening? 
> I'm runnig : [root
> > mediaproxy]# ./mediaproxy.py --version mediaproxy.py 1.0 
> Thanks in advance.
> > Regards, Ricardo M. 
> _______________________________________________ Serusers
> > mailing list serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > _______________________________________________ Serusers 
> mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > 
> > 
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>