[Serusers] RTP Wiretapping

Jiri Kuthan jiri at iptel.org
Thu Mar 3 21:53:33 CET 2005


Steve,

I am having a language difficulty -- what do you mean by mediaproxy's
_intergrity_?

Thanks!

-jiri

At 03:51 PM 3/2/2005, Steve Blair wrote:

>Paul:
>
> This may be a little off topic but what are the legal issues you or your
>company face with CALEA? I'd be surprised if the integrity of the
>mediaproxy wouldn't become an issue if such a case went to Court.
>Have you look into this?
>
>Just curious,
>Steve
>
>Java Rockx wrote:
>
>>I was thinking about having a group called "spy" in the grp table and
>>anyone with this ACL would be sent to a modified mediaproxy that would
>>capture the RTP.
>>
>>User that don't have the "spy" ACL would be handled normally and if
>>NAT traversal is needed then use an unmodified media proxy.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Paul
>>
>>
>>On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 08:00:24 -0000, Chris <ser at cannes.f9.co.uk> wrote:
>> 
>>
>>>Why not use a from/to etc detection in .cfg (using database...)
>>>to trigger a remote proxy through the requesting agency
>>>They then have the capture issue
>>>and you have no monitor or delivery issues?
>>>Might require conditions of their placement of a proxy?
>>>(but is their problem)
>>>Regards
>>>Chris
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: serusers-bounces at iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On
>>>Behalf Of Java Rockx
>>>Sent: 26 February 2005 14:29
>>>To: serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>>Subject: [Serusers] RTP Wiretapping
>>>
>>>Hi All.
>>>
>>>I'm located in the US and would like to comply with the Communications
>>>Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) that Congress passed which
>>>basically says that VoIP providers should have the ability to wiretap
>>>conversations for the FBI upon request.
>>>
>>>I use mediaproxy for NAT traversal. So my question is how can I be
>>>CALEA compliant? I assume I should be able to modify mediaproxy to
>>>write RTP streams to disk, but I'm unclear on how to "mix" both sides
>>>of the conversation.
>>>
>>>Can anyone help with a suggestion?
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Paul
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Serusers mailing list
>>>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>
>>>--
>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>>>Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.5.0 - Release Date: 25/02/2005
>>>
>>>--
>>>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>>>Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.5.2 - Release Date: 28/02/2005
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Serusers mailing list
>>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>> 
>
>-- 
> 
>ISC Network Engineering
>The University of Pennsylvania
>3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A
>Philadelphia, PA 19104  
>
>
>voice: 215-573-8396 
>      215-746-8001
>
>fax: 215-898-9348    
>
>sip:blairs at upenn.edu
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

--
Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/ 




More information about the sr-users mailing list