[Serusers] Please help...

[Mohammad Khan]

Zeus Ng wrote:

>If you just want MESSAGE, follow my previous advice. There is no need for
>rtpproxy. As for online status, the pa module should be able to help. Can't
>offer much help on this as I don't use this module much.
>
>Zeus
>
>  
>

Yes, for MESSAGE there is no need of RTPProxy.
I have just learn it after re-read SER-Introduction by Jan Janak

It is because, every MESSAGE must go through sip-proxy.

Thanks,
MOhammad



>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Mohammad Khan
>>Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2005 4:14 PM
>>To: Zeus Ng
>>Cc: 'serusers'
>>Subject: RE: [Serusers] Please help...
>>
>>
>>Zeus,
>>
>>Thanks for replying me.
>>
>>Again,
>>My SER behind NAT, so is rtpproxy. rtpproxy and ser running 
>>on the same machine.
>>
>>consider these two UA register outside my network.
>>UA1 (kphone)            -> beeplove at projuktee.com (my domain)
>>UA2 (windows messenger) -> beeplove at iptel.org (other domain)
>>
>>@ UA1 can send message UA2 and UA2 receives that message
>>@ UA1 can't see UA2's status. In other words, UA1 dont know 
>>if UA2 is online. So is UA2. @ As windows messenger can't 
>>send message to any user that appears to offline, UA2 can't 
>>start sending message to UA1 but UA2 can send message to UA1 
>>once it get message from UA1.
>>
>>What do you think?
>>    
>>
>
>  
>