[Serusers] :-((

[Mohammad Khan]

Last night I went through Ser-Indroduction by Jan Janak and Ser-HowTo.

Besides not implemening nathelper properly,
I needed to tell Windows Messenger to use UDP protocol and also need to 
provide my server ip or hostname.
Just doing this, I noticed couple of progress.

Also, I need to learn howto implement nathelper as well as writing ser.cfg

Thanks everybody who read my posting and tried to help me.
MOhammad


Zeus Ng wrote:

>Judging from your description, you haven't implement nathelper well enough
>to handle NATed clients. Haven't spend a lot of time looking at your ser.cfg
>but I notice one thing. You do not have reply route block to handle NATed
>clients and is doing the checking in request block. 
>
>That status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]" thing should go to reply block and it is
>better to use t_check_status() for that purpose.
>
>Zeus
>
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org 
>>[mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Mohammad Khan
>>Sent: Thursday, 3 March 2005 7:52 AM
>>To: Steve Blair
>>Cc: serusers
>>Subject: Re: [Serusers] :-((
>>
>>
>>Whenever two UAs are from two different netwok ... 
>>communication fails.
>>inside my network, two UA can communicate.
>>outside my network but withing same network two UA can communicate.
>>
>>BTW, is this right way to run rtpproxy on an internet facing computer.
>>
>>rtpproxy -s udp:192.168.71.1:22222 -l 66.92.xx.yyy
>>modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_sock", "udp:192.168.71.1:22222")
>>
>>Thanks for replying me.
>>MOhammad
>>
>>
>>Steve Blair wrote:
>>
>
>
>  
>