[Serusers] :-((

Zeus Ng zeus.ng at isquare.com.au
Thu Mar 3 03:22:08 CET 2005


Judging from your description, you haven't implement nathelper well enough
to handle NATed clients. Haven't spend a lot of time looking at your ser.cfg
but I notice one thing. You do not have reply route block to handle NATed
clients and is doing the checking in request block. 

That status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]" thing should go to reply block and it is
better to use t_check_status() for that purpose.

Zeus

> -----Original Message-----
> From: serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org 
> [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Mohammad Khan
> Sent: Thursday, 3 March 2005 7:52 AM
> To: Steve Blair
> Cc: serusers
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] :-((
> 
> 
> Whenever two UAs are from two different netwok ... 
> communication fails.
> inside my network, two UA can communicate.
> outside my network but withing same network two UA can communicate.
> 
> BTW, is this right way to run rtpproxy on an internet facing computer.
> 
> rtpproxy -s udp:192.168.71.1:22222 -l 66.92.xx.yyy
> modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_sock", "udp:192.168.71.1:22222")
> 
> Thanks for replying me.
> MOhammad
> 
> 
> Steve Blair wrote:




More information about the sr-users mailing list