[Serusers] another cancel test

[Jan Janak]

On 01-03 21:19, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Jan Janak writes:
> 
>  >   Actually I think that you should apply exactly the same logic as when
>  >   processing the INVITE. CANCEL can be also sent end-to-end and in this
>  >   case the user location lookup would be necessary to route it to the
>  >   callee.
> 
> jan,
> 
> under what circumstances cancel is sent end-to-end?  my understanding
> from rfc3261 is that if a proxy has STATEFULLY forwarded an invite, the
> corresponding cancel is always a hop-by-hop request.  if invite was
> forwarded statelessly, then also cancel must be forwarded statelessly in
> the same way as invite, because there is no response context for it.

  I am sorry, I was wrong (I confused CANCELs with ACKs).

    Jan.