[Serusers] SER FIFO and routing

Samuel Osorio Calvo samuel.osorio at nl.thalesgroup.com
Tue Jun 28 15:48:34 CEST 2005


I guess the admin guide is not popular.....

You can explicitely say the next hop where SER has to send the message by adding a new line between the Req-URI and the first dot...

:t_uac_dlg:cc_reply
BYE
sip:00111111111111 at 11.12.13.134:5060 
->11.12.13.135<- maybe with a sip: prefix...
..
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 31.32.33.34:25972;branch=z9hG4bKdb61c97f9cba17c1

Hope it helps,

Samuel.


Unclassified.
>>> "Stuart Kirkwood - Jubilee Consutancy Limited" <stuart at jubileeconsultancy.com> 06/28/05 03:45PM >>>
Hi

I have a problem with the FIFO request below.  The SIP request should route
through 11.12.13.135 which guards the gateway at 11.12.13.134.  The IP
packet containing the SIP message that SER generates is good but SER sets
the destination IP address of the packet as 11.12.13.134 and not
11.12.13.135. Is there something wrong with my request or is this a bug?
Any help appreciated.

:t_uac_dlg:cc_reply
BYE
sip:00111111111111 at 11.12.13.134:5060 
..
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 31.32.33.34:25972;branch=z9hG4bKdb61c97f9cba17c1
From: <sip:1000 at xsipserver.com>;tag=c53a53516c552844
To: <sip:11111111111 at xsipserver.com>;tag=3ADD9EA0-1EC0
Call-ID: 7c70b0b24a053e37 at 192.168.7.21 
CSeq: 52779 BYE
Route: <sip:11.12.13.135;ftag=c53a53516c552844;lr=on>
Max-Forwards: 69
..
..

I'm running SER 0.8.14 on Fedora Core 3.

Thank you.

Stuart



_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers at lists.iptel.org 
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers




More information about the sr-users mailing list