[Serusers] lost in cvs tags - difference between 0.9.3 and rel_0_9_0

[Cesc]

I would suggest you try to find a nice "CVS 101" tutorial on the web,
there must be zillions of them. Something, btw, which everbody should
do if they intend on developing on ser, not just being a user.

On the other hand, i do agree that the branch names used are not clear
(but hei, let's not be so picky :D ), as well as the tag names (which
there are a loooot :D ).

Regards,

Cesc

On 6/16/05, Mohammad Khan <info at beeplove.com> wrote:
> Same here .
>  From bugs.sip-router.org.. there have total three version
> 0.8.14
> 0.9.3
> HEAD
> 
> I understand 0.8.14 is the lastest stable version.
> What is difference between 0.9.3 and HEAD ?
> Sometime ppl talk about 0.9.0 and 0.9.1 and 0.9.2. Where are they
> I think, I need to understand verstion tagging.
> 
> If anybody can explain this, would be really very helpful for me and
> others like me.
> 
> Thanks,
> MOhammad
> 
> 
> Klaus Darilion wrote:
> 
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm lost in the name of new ser versions and the CVS tags. There is
> > talk about version 0.9, 0.9.2 and 0.9.3, although I only found
> > rel_0_9_0 on cvs.
> >
> > What is the relation between this versions and the CVS tag.
> >
> > thanks,
> > klaus
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>