[Serusers] Re: [Serdev] openser/ser - avoiding forks

[Cesc]

Hi,

This is a good move, but this is just a cosmetic change. Suddenly
adding patches and new features forgotten may ease some tensions, but
background problems persist as to the whole philosophy of SER.

Let's not fork (also) from the main discussion topic ;)

Cesc

On 6/16/05, Jan Janak <jan at iptel.org> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am trying to reconcile patches and improvement suggestions that have been
> left unanswered on the mailing lists. I went through serusers and serdev
> mailing list archives from the beginning of 2004 till now.
> 
> I was mainly focusing on submitted patches and non-trivial feature requests.
> Below is a list of issues that I was able to find in the mailing list archives.
> Given the number of messages that were sent to the lists in the last year
> I am pretty sure that the list below will miss many suggestions.
> 
> If you submitted a patch or improvement and it was neither accepted nor rejected,
> and it is still relevant, please resubmit your proposal to serdev at iptel.org
> mailing list or (preferably) create an issue in the bug tracking system at:
> 
> http://bugs.sip-router.org
>