[Serusers] OpenSER release

[Maxim Sobolev]

Why not just make private branch in the main repository in which you
can make that "fast progress"? That way you can ensure that the code
can be merged back and forth without any difficulties.

-Maxim

On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:31:20PM +0300, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> Dave,
> 
> openser is an alternative for people who needs fast progress. There are 
> more and more people asking when some feature will be available in a 
> stable release or if a contribution will be ever accepted. For example 
> our guys came up with a  ACC patch to implement custom accounting - 
> feature witch was ask by some users. But for almost half a year the 
> patch was ignore by module maintainers....the same with TLS or other 
> features. OpenSER wants to overcome this problem. And btw, the scripting 
> is the same, compatibility will be maintained...but with more features 
> and more module. We shouldn't confuse interoperability with enhancement.
> 
> We are SER people, even core developers of SER, but we cannot impose our 
> point of view over the whole project - there are other people 
> responsible for other parts of code and I cannot neither go over their 
> code, neither to force them to progress.
> It's just a matter of effort versus waisted effort........
> 
> bogdan
> 
> Dave wrote:
> 
> >I do not think openser is a good idea. This will only
> >lead to further confusion and interoperability
> >problems vis-a-vis ser.cfg. 
> >
> >Why can't the openser guys invest their time and
> >efforts to work with ser people rather than forking on
> >a new path? 
> >
> >It seems to me voice-systems.ro is trying to endorse
> >itself by launching openser.
> >
> >Dave
> > 
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
>