[Serusers] architecture question on Sending Invite Upon 302 Moved Temp (Redirect)
Juha Heinanen
jh at tutpro.com
Mon Jun 13 16:24:45 CEST 2005
mark wehberg writes:
> The question I have is, what is the reason not to have that
> functionality built into SER or the option to not "relay back upstream"
> the 302, but have SER process the message? Is there something I am
> missing?
that functionality could be built into ser, but currently i don't know
any means on how to get access to contact body in a ser module.
turning 302s to invites should be end user configurable option, because
otherwise ser may get an unpleasant surprise, when he/she gets a bill
for calls he thought he never made.
-- juha
More information about the sr-users
mailing list