[Serusers] How to execute failure_route block by the same child process.

[Dmitry Isakbayev]

Hi Marian,

Thank you taking the time to answer my question.  The serial forking example 
is exactly what I need.  Is there a sample "set_fork_list()" function that 
you can point me to?

Regards,
Dmitry



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marian Dumitru" <marian.dumitru at voice-sistem.ro>
To: "Dmitry Isakbayev" <isakdim at gmail.com>
Cc: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] How to execute failure_route block by the same child 
process.


> Hi Dimitry,
>
> you don't need to implement anything else for serial forking - it's 
> already there. Take a look to this example which shows a way to do it:
>
> http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/ar01s08.html#ex_serial_forking
>
> about your question - no, is not possible. If you want to store some 
> information from main route and used in failure_route use AVPs. (see 
> avpops module)
> http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/
>
> regards,
> Marian
>
> Dmitry Isakbayev wrote:
>> Hello,
>>  I am trying to implement sequential forking using to_on_failure and 
>> failure_route blocks.  Is there a way to configure SER or tm module to 
>> execute the 'failure-route' blocks using the same process as was used for 
>> executing the main route script?  If it was possible, I would not need to 
>> share state information between different SER processes
>>  Thank you in advance,
>>  Dmitry
>>
>
> -- 
> Voice System
> http://www.voice-system.ro