[Serusers] How to execute failure_route block by the same child process.
Marian Dumitru
marian.dumitru at voice-sistem.ro
Fri Jun 10 12:16:59 CEST 2005
Hi Dimitry,
you don't need to implement anything else for serial forking - it's
already there. Take a look to this example which shows a way to do it:
http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/ar01s08.html#ex_serial_forking
about your question - no, is not possible. If you want to store some
information from main route and used in failure_route use AVPs. (see
avpops module)
http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/avpops/
regards,
Marian
Dmitry Isakbayev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to implement sequential forking using to_on_failure and
> failure_route blocks. Is there a way to configure SER or tm module to
> execute the 'failure-route' blocks using the same process as was used
> for executing the main route script? If it was possible, I would not
> need to share state information between different SER processes
>
> Thank you in advance,
>
> Dmitry
>
--
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro
More information about the sr-users
mailing list