[Serusers] Sipura NOTIFY

Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Wed Jan 12 00:27:16 CET 2005


I'm also looking on the Event: header (not sure - i think it was keepalive)

regards,
klaus

Matt Schulte wrote:

> Hmm, my biggest fear is of course selling these to the end user who buys
> their own UA.. If that happens we can't do much about disabling on the
> client side. For now I just put in the same as you. Did you just do an
> if method == NOTIFY? Or did you catch that and also search for the
> keepalive? Since we won't be using MWI or anything I just did on method
> notify..
> 
> 	Matt
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at] 
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 4:24 PM
> To: Matt Schulte
> Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] Sipura NOTIFY
> 
> 
> I catch them and answer with "200 OK". Better solution: turn this 
> feature of in the SIPURA devices - from my experiences, keep alive with 
> CRLF also works and does not create so much traffic.
> 
> regards,
> klaus
> 
> Matt Schulte wrote:
> 
>>It seems Sipura's use NOTIFY for their keepalives, since the user in 
>>question is registered, I was wondering what others have done out 
>>there to ack these messages? It's of course easiest to ignore these 
>>but I wanted an alternative. :-)
>>
>>	Matt
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Serusers mailing list
>>serusers at lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 




More information about the sr-users mailing list