[Serusers] Sipura NOTIFY
Klaus Darilion
klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Wed Jan 12 00:27:16 CET 2005
I'm also looking on the Event: header (not sure - i think it was keepalive)
regards,
klaus
Matt Schulte wrote:
> Hmm, my biggest fear is of course selling these to the end user who buys
> their own UA.. If that happens we can't do much about disabling on the
> client side. For now I just put in the same as you. Did you just do an
> if method == NOTIFY? Or did you catch that and also search for the
> keepalive? Since we won't be using MWI or anything I just did on method
> notify..
>
> Matt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at]
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 4:24 PM
> To: Matt Schulte
> Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] Sipura NOTIFY
>
>
> I catch them and answer with "200 OK". Better solution: turn this
> feature of in the SIPURA devices - from my experiences, keep alive with
> CRLF also works and does not create so much traffic.
>
> regards,
> klaus
>
> Matt Schulte wrote:
>
>>It seems Sipura's use NOTIFY for their keepalives, since the user in
>>question is registered, I was wondering what others have done out
>>there to ack these messages? It's of course easiest to ignore these
>>but I wanted an alternative. :-)
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Serusers mailing list
>>serusers at lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>>
>
>
>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list