[Serusers] parallel forking best practice?

[Jev]

Hi Vitaly,

Thank you for your reply,

But do you have parallel forking working this way? So two or more phones 
ring at once. As opposed to one phone ringing for N seconds, and then 
another ringing (sequential forking).

Is it possible to do parallel forking with exec_dset()? I did not think 
that it was.


Thanks,
-Jev

Vitaly Nikolaev wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I do not know that it is best, I even sure that it is not :) but it very
> useful and very flexible to execute external application that will return
> list of URI.
> 
> Why it flexible - because you can do, for example, balancing of whatever you
> use for termination all (in my case b2bua) plus I use nagios that testing my
> b2buas/gws/voicemails and then my "routing" script uses this info to avoid
> bad destinations
> 
> Plus different features like, call return, redial, call forward, step by
> step routing (like first call ring on your SIP device, if it fail it ring on
> your office phone and if it fail goes to your cell phone and same time to
> your gf cell phone :)) My script taking all this info from MSSQL database,
> of course it add some delay to your call (PDD) but that the price, you can
> always use few boxes with this setup in parallel (replicate) and do
> redundant SQL server for fast answer
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: serusers-bounces at iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On
> Behalf Of Jev
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 11:01 AM
> To: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Subject: [Serusers] parallel forking best practice?
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> For the 0_9_0 branch, what is the 'best practice' for implementing 
> parallel forking?
> 
> We used to be able to point one alias at several accounts, but that 
> feature has regressed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> -Jev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
>