[Serusers] STUN for NAT traversal...
Greger V. Teigre
greger at teigre.com
Mon Aug 1 10:50:29 CEST 2005
Unless the NAT is a symmetric NAT. Look at the incoming REGISTER messages and how you detect NAT presence. There must be something in the message (or your code, or your STUN) that sets the flag for that location. Use serctl ul show to see whether the flag is set.
---- Original Message ----
From: Roger Lewau
To: serusers at lists.iptel.org
Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2005 10:00 PM
Subject: [Serusers] STUN for NAT traversal...
> I'm trying to use STUN for NAT traversal for all clients not using 1
> to 1 NATing, and mediaproxy for the rare few who does.But it seems
> that all traffic is proxied anyway, dont really understand why. I do
> call the routeblock for mediaproxy before relaying the call, but
> since STUN is used it should not detect that NAT is in place. Or am I
> missing some logic?
> Any Idea on how to accomplish this?
> Kind regards
> Roger - Getting one step closer to a really god service everyday ;)
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the sr-users