[Serusers] what is the best way of using asterisk as B2BUA

[Iqbal]

As I mentioned I dont do combo anymore, it sdidnt make sense to me

Iqbal

Elton Machado wrote:

>Hi, 
>
>
>Iqbal, please forward me an e.g. of this combo configuration , as I'm
>willing also to have it to compare with my trials. 
>
>Regards, 
>
>Elton
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: serusers-bounces at iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On
>Behalf Of Iqbal
>Sent: quinta-feira, 28 de Abril de 2005 11:43
>To: Kamran Ahmad
>Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
>Subject: Re: [Serusers] what is the best way of using asterisk as B2BUA
>
>Hi
>
>I originally had a setup like this, but to me it just seemed way to 
>expensive to be doing this, since you will need to add asterisk boxes, 
>just to keep doing these "u-turns", and because you want the billing 
>info. Also, I started to have problem when I hit the external gateway, 
>because originally again i did this via asterisk, which then passing 
>data back to ser gave headaches. But if anyone gets this combo up and 
>running weel would be interested to know complete setup.
>
>Iqbal
>
>Kamran Ahmad wrote:
>
>  
>
>>hello Carles Wang
>>
>>This is the way to to successfully call through
>>asterisk.
>>
>>SER is Main Registrar. Asterisk is B2BUA.
>>
>>SER will route its call to asterisk.
>>now control is at asterisk side he can do any thing to
>>that call (forword, voicemail, etc....). but actually
>>asterisk dont know who is the user he ll route this
>>call back to SER who is aware of the user.
>>it is like U-Turn through Asterisk. try this and tell
>>me
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>ser.cfg
>>------------------------
>>rewritehostport("asterisk:port");
>>force_rport();
>>fix_nated_contact();
>>force_rtp_proxy();
>>t_relay();
>>
>>
>>sip.conf
>>------------------------
>>[general]
>>context=default                               
>>port=5070
>>bindaddr=0.0.0.0
>>srvlookup=no
>>
>>[2000]
>>callerid=2000
>>type=friend
>>host=dynamic
>>canreinvite=no
>>reinvite=no
>>qualify=yes
>>auth=plaintext
>>nat=yes
>>                                                     
>>                                         
>>[3000]
>>type=friend
>>host=dynamic
>>callerid=3000
>>qualify=yes
>>canreinvite=no
>>reinvite=no
>>auth=plaintext
>>nat=yes
>>
>>
>>
>>--- Charles Wang <lazy.charles at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I also have the same problem. I don't know how to
>>>fix it. Do you get
>>>any solution or sample config about it. I think it
>>>is a problem of
>>>asterisk.
>>>
>>>On 4/28/05, Kamran Ahmad <p_kami at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>hi list
>>>>
>>>>any person using ser and Asterisk as B2bUA.
>>>>
>>>>what is the best way of using asterisk as B2BUA.
>>>>
>>>>i can route calls to through asterisk its working
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>but
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>some time one UA tries to hangup the call and the
>>>>other side is not able to receive Bye
>>>>
>>>>what could be the best way of using asterisk for
>>>>monitering voice
>>>>
>>>>Thanks
>>>>Kamran
>>>>
>>>>__________________________________________________
>>>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>>>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>protection around
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>http://mail.yahoo.com
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Serusers mailing list
>>>>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>-- 
>>>
>>>Best Regards
>>>Charles
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>__________________________________________________
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
>>http://mail.yahoo.com 
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Serusers mailing list
>>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>>.
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
>.
>
>  
>