[Serusers] SER high availability setup

[Cameron Beattie]

"SER does not support failover" yet. What do you mean? I thought it was 
Asterisk that had the problem with DNS SRV, not SER.

Regards

Cameron
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Atif Rasheed" <atif at burraqtel.com.pk>
To: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 1:32 AM
Subject: [Serusers] SER high availability setup


> Hi,
>
> I am trying to deploy a solution as shown below:
>
>
>     SER<------>Asterisk1
>           |
>            --->Asterisk2
>           |
>            --->Asterisk3
>
> Calls come in to the SER machine. I want to distribute calls among the 
> asterisk machines(all with the same specifications). I initially tried 
> using DNS round robin. It works well but doesn not have builtin failover 
> mechanisms. So if a machine goes down calls will not be rerouted and sent 
> to other available machines.
> I then tried using DNS SRV but, it seems, unfortunately SER does not 
> support failover support yet. Now I am not sure how to distribute load 
> amongst these machines. Any ideas suggestions will greatly be appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> Danish
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>