[Serusers] Remote ser management instead of FIFO

[Java Rockx]

Hi All.

I think the entire ser community would agree that this is not really the 
best way to manage external connectivity to ser. It's just a maintenance 
nightmare - so an abstraction layer is desperately needed. 

I'm also have the opinion that the FIFO needs to be phased out and 
completely replaced with a real network server.

Just my $0.02 worth.

Regards,
Paul

On 4/15/05, Juha Heinanen <jh at tutpro.com> wrote:
> 
> Marian Dumitru writes:
> 
> > similar to FIFO interface, there is a UNIX socket one. Also I saw posted
> > recently a patch for UDP/TCP sockets, but haven't tried yet.
> 
> i tried it and it worked ok for some functions and not for some others.
> also, it currently doesn't support an allowed clients file or database
> table.
> 
> there is something wrong in the design of external access to ser.
> an abstraction layer is missing between modules and external access
> methods. so each module has to currently support fifo, unix
> socket, and also tcp/udp interface.
> 
> -- juha
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20050415/ee54047f/attachment.htm>