[Serusers] 0.9.0 Stability

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

you have to edit the Makefile.defs, comment the line with 
-DDBG_QM_MALLOC and uncomment the one with -DF_MALLOC (somewhere around 
line 300). Then recompile&reinstall -- do not forget the radius modules, 
they are not compiled/installed by default.

Daniel

On 04/12/05 02:03, Rod Bacon wrote:

> Can someone please let me know how to get rid of all the "extra debug 
> information", as I am trying to debug a RADIUS problem, but can't find 
> any useful info because of all the memory debug stuff that's in the way.
>  
>  
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     *From:* Java Rockx <mailto:javarockx at gmail.com>
>     *To:* Steve Blair <mailto:blairs at isc.upenn.edu>
>     *Cc:* serusers at lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers at lists.iptel.org> ; Rod Bacon
>     <mailto:rod.bacon at empoweredcomms.com.au>
>     *Sent:* Friday, April 08, 2005 3:21 AM
>     *Subject:* Re: [Serusers] 0.9.0 Stability
>
>     Thanks for the info. The thing to keep in mind with ser-0.9.x is
>     that I belive extra debug information is still enabled in the
>     Makefile.
>
>     Regards,
>     Paul
>
>     On Apr 7, 2005 12:41 PM, *Steve Blair* <blairs at isc.upenn.edu
>     <mailto:blairs at isc.upenn.edu>> wrote:
>
>
>         Paul:
>
>            Two things=are getting me right now both are errors with
>         serctl.
>         The main problem =s the inability to add/delete aliases. It seems
>         SER remembers the previ=usly defined alias but serctl will not
>         delete it. Therefore I cannot re=lace that alias with a new one.
>
>            One other annoying iss=e is the copious amount of log messages
>         that are written to syslog when=the server is shutdown. It is
>         so bad
>         I've actually stored up several ch=nges, schedule an outage,
>         reboot
>         the entire machine, implement the chan=es and hope I haven't made
>         a mistake.
>
>            I'd have to c=eck on the version but I think it is 0.9.1
>         and the
>         last checkout was ab=ut one  week ago.
>
>
>         Java Rockx wrote:
>
>         > Steve=
>         >
>         > Can you give a few examples of the "odd little behav=ors"
>         you see with
>         > ser-0.9?
>         >
>         > Also, are you usin= 0.9.0 or 0.9.1. If 0.9.1, how recent was
>         your CVS
>         > checkout?
>         &g=;
>         > Regards,
>         > Paul
>         >
>         > On Apr 7, 2005 6:24 AM, *S=eve Blair* <blairs at isc.upenn.ed=
>         <mailto:blairs at isc.upenn.edu>
>         > <mailto:blairs at isc=upenn.edu <mailto:blairs at isc.upenn.edu>>>
>         wrote:
>         >
>         >
>         >   &nbs=; Rod:
>         >
>         >       Overall I'd say=yes. The avp functionality has been
>         the biggest win
>         >  &nb=p;  for us.
>         >     We still have several odd=little behaviors some of which are
>         >     actuall= bugs.
>         >     This is a little unnerving on produ=tion systems but we
>         are using
>         >     the 0.9.0
>
>         >
>         >  &n=sp;  -Steve
>         >
>         >     Rod Bacon wrote:<=r>>
>         >     > I understand that the latest &=uot;stable" release is
>         still 0.8.14, but
>         >   &nb=p; > what are peoples general experiences with 0.9.0?
>         > &nbs=;   >
>         >     > Is it worth the up=rade?
>         >     >
>         >    => _______________________________________________
>         >  &n=sp;  > Serusers mailing list
>         >     > =a href="mailto:serusers at lists.iptel.org">serusers at lists.iptel.org
>         <mailto:serusers at lists.iptel.org>
>         > =nbsp;   > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>         <http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/s=rusers>
>         >
>         >=     _______________________________________________*>    
>         Serusers mailing list
>         >  &nb=p;  serusers at lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers at lists.iptel.org>
>         <=ailto:serusers at lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers at lists.iptel.org>>
>         =gt;     http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>         <http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listi=fo/serusers>
>         >*>
>
>         --
>
>         ISC Network Engineering
>         The University of Pennsy=vania
>         3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A
>         Philadelphia, PA 19104
>
>         v=ice: 215-573-8396
>
>                215-746-8001=br>
>         fax: 215-898-9348
>
>         si=:blairs at upenn.edu <mailto:sip:blairs at upenn.edu>
>
>         **
>
>     **
>     **
>
>     ** **
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     ** ****_______________________________________________
>     Serusers mailing list
>     serusers at lists.iptel.org
>     http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers**
>
>**
>**
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>**
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>**
>