[Serusers] 0.9.0 Stability

[Rod Bacon]

Can someone please let me know how to get rid of all the "extra debug information", as I am trying to debug a RADIUS problem, but can't find any useful info because of all the memory debug stuff that's in the way.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Java Rockx 
  To: Steve Blair 
  Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org ; Rod Bacon 
  Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 3:21 AM
  Subject: Re: [Serusers] 0.9.0 Stability


  Thanks for the info. The thing to keep in mind with ser-0.9.x is that I belive extra debug information is still enabled in the Makefile.

  Regards,
  Paul


  On Apr 7, 2005 12:41 PM, Steve Blair <blairs at isc.upenn.edu> wrote:

    Paul:

       Two things=are getting me right now both are errors with serctl.
    The main problem =s the inability to add/delete aliases. It seems
    SER remembers the previ=usly defined alias but serctl will not
    delete it. Therefore I cannot re=lace that alias with a new one.

       One other annoying iss=e is the copious amount of log messages
    that are written to syslog when=the server is shutdown. It is so bad
    I've actually stored up several ch=nges, schedule an outage, reboot
    the entire machine, implement the chan=es and hope I haven't made
    a mistake.

       I'd have to c=eck on the version but I think it is 0.9.1 and the
    last checkout was ab=ut one  week ago.


    Java Rockx wrote:

    > Steve=
    >
    > Can you give a few examples of the "odd little behav=ors" you see with
    > ser-0.9?
    >
    > Also, are you usin= 0.9.0 or 0.9.1. If 0.9.1, how recent was your CVS
    > checkout?
    &g=;
    > Regards,
    > Paul
    >
    > On Apr 7, 2005 6:24 AM, *S=eve Blair* <blairs at isc.upenn.ed=
    > <mailto:blairs at isc=upenn.edu>> wrote:
    >
    >
    >   &nbs=; Rod:
    >
    >       Overall I'd say=yes. The avp functionality has been the biggest win
    >  &nb=p;  for us.
    >     We still have several odd=little behaviors some of which are
    >     actuall= bugs.
    >     This is a little unnerving on produ=tion systems but we are using
    >     the 0.9.0>
    >  &n=sp;  -Steve
    >
    >     Rod Bacon wrote:<=r>>
    >     > I understand that the latest &=uot;stable" release is still 0.8.14, but
    >   &nb=p; > what are peoples general experiences with 0.9.0?
    > &nbs=;   >
    >     > Is it worth the up=rade?
    >     >
    >    => _______________________________________________
    >  &n=sp;  > Serusers mailing list
    >     > =a href="mailto:serusers at lists.iptel.org">serusers at lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers at lists.iptel.org>
    > =nbsp;   > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
    >
    >=     _______________________________________________>     Serusers mailing list
    >  &nb=p;  serusers at lists.iptel.org <=ailto:serusers at lists.iptel.org>
    =gt;     http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
    >>

    --

    ISC Network Engineering
    The University of Pennsy=vania
    3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A
    Philadelphia, PA 19104

    v=ice: 215-573-8396

           215-746-8001=br>
    fax: 215-898-9348

    si=:blairs at upenn.edu



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Serusers mailing list
  serusers at lists.iptel.org
  http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20050412/ece4bfa4/attachment.htm>