[Serusers] Load Balancing via UltraMonkey/ldirectord

[Greger V. Teigre]

If you see another thread (using the rather intuitive subject: Re: 
[Serusers] more usrloc synchronization), you will see discussions on using 
LVS in general. AFAIK, which high availability solution to use for LVS, is 
more based on your personal preferences, UltraMonkey is probably a safe 
choice.  Anyway, you will need to address the "stickiness" issue.
g-)

Matt Schulte wrote:
> Has anyone attempted to load balance SER using Ultramonkey/ldirectord?
> I've noticed all it does is pretty much NAT and send requests
> accordingly, the trick I guess would be the NAT part. If the SIP
> headers = myself, would there really be any issues? One problem I can
> foresee is the possibility that loose routing would hit the wrong
> server. Just wanted to ask around before I wasted time trying it out
> for myself :-) Thanks
>
> Matt
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers