[Serusers] NAT NAT..and a little more NAT

[Iqbal]

Interesting, I always seem to go via the mediaproxy when going outbound
to pstn or even inbound, but I dont know much about the use of
direction=active, is it supported is clients these days, from what I
googled it was a add-on.

Iqbal

On 4/3/2005, "Juha Heinanen" <jh at tutpro.com> wrote:

>Greger V. Teigre writes:
>
> > I suspect this is one of those questions where you know the answer
> > ;-) Yes, you're of course right.  You inject a direction=active in
> > the failure_route, so that the GW will wait for the media before
> > sending.  However, I have had some issues with some clients that I
> > haven't really figured completely out yet and I'm trying to be
> > conservative.  Do you have experiences where this work? If so, which
> > GWs and clients do you have good experiences with?
>
>in my configuration, i have always used pstn gw both directions without
>mediaproxy.  proxy just adds direction=active to sdp towards gw if sip
>ua sis behind nat.  i didn't know that there may be some issues.  my gws
>are ciscos and i have had various sip uas such as grandstreams, cisco
>atas, sipuras, kphone, etc.
>
>-- juha
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>